The Australian Government's changes to the Franchising Code of Conduct are set to take effect on April 1.
The changes have significant implications for both franchisors and franchisees, with an explanatory statement detailing the changes.
The new Code is the culmination of several formal reviews, including the Dr Michael Schaper Report, into the regulatory framework for franchising in Australia. The proposed reforms are wide-reaching in part, and the scope and future impact of new provisions will emerge over time.
We explore the changes and what they mean below.
The purpose of the New Code
A starting point is the inclusion of a new definition of its 'Purpose':
"This instrument prescribes a mandatory industry code for the franchising industry. The Code requires franchisors, franchisees and prospective franchisees:
The Code also includes:
The Code also confers functions on the Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman in relation to the Code and confers functions on the Secretary for the administration of the Franchise Disclosure Register."
High level comments on some changes
This article will not canvass all of the changes, some of which are procedural and other minor.
Having said that, the New Code does not adopt the former numbering but labels the previous 'clauses' now as 'sections' (but which do not align with the former numbering). We note there is a comparative table showing Old Law Clauses v New Law Sections at Attachment C of the Explanatory Statement.
However, there are several significant changes which we will highlight. At the same time, we will reiterate critical obligations which remain.
Also, we will not refer to the particular sections which apply to Motor Vehicle Dealerships. Suffice it to say that where, under the former Motor Vehicle Code, there were provisions particular to that Code, in many instances, these have now been extended to apply across all franchises.
Obligation to act in good faith
That obligation remains. However, it is now re-enforced by making non compliance an offence which attracts up to 600 penalty units, (a penalty unit is currently AUD $330). See S 18 (1)-(5).
At the same time, the qualification remains that:
S 18 (6): "To avoid doubt, the obligation to act in good faith does not prevent a party to a franchise agreement, or a person who proposes to become such a party, from acting in the party's, or the person's, legitimate commercial interests."
Further, importantly, there is the S18 (7) qualification.
S18(7): "To avoid doubt, if a franchise agreement does not:
Disclosure document
This obligation remains to provide a Disclosure Document which strictly complies with the New Code. However, there are going to be changes in content as a result of changes brought about by the New Code.
The new requirements for the Disclosure Document are set out in Schedule 1 to the New Code. For instance, a franchisor will have to provide additional information about whether a franchisor will require the franchisee to undertake significant capital expenditure, including the justification for such expenditure.
On the good news front for franchisors, the previous obligation for franchisors to provide a Key Facts Sheet has been removed and no longer necessary.
New civil penalties
The Explanatory Statement contains a repeated justification for the high increase of sections that will attract civil penalties. "The civil penalty is necessary to promote timely compliance and deter misconduct."
In an attempt to address a perceived need for further compliance, with several sections (where this was not in place under the Old Code), now invoke civil penalties for non-compliance up to 600 penalty units. A penalty unit is currently $330 so the maximum where penalty units apply is $198,000 for each infringement.
Additionally, the New Code adopts a recommendation from the Schaper Report where he proposed an alternative higher penalty regime. This is to apply to a number of sections, being ss 34(1) & (2), 45(2), (3) & (5), 46(2) and 64.
This is provided for in s 17 (2):
There is lack of definition or prescription, so what would constitute "the value of the benefit" and what are the criteria to assess the "adjusted turnover" will produce considerable debate before a Court gives further guidance in the future.
A 'name and shame' power has also been bestowed upon the Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman, which can publicise franchisors who fail to engage in alternative dispute resolution mechanisms provided for under the New Code.
These changes reflect the Code's increasing emphasis placed on alternative dispute resolution and disincentivising litigation.
Specific purpose funds
Whereas the terminology under the Old Code dealt with 'marketing funds', this has been superseded under the New Code with the new term "specific purpose fund".
This is defined in s 6 and covers the situation where a franchisee is required to pay monies for a specified common purpose. S 31 sets out the accounting and reporting obligations upon the franchisor to ensure transparency that the funds are being spent for the specific purpose.
Under the Old Code provisions, there were some areas, such as 'cooperative funds' that arguably fell outside the provisions. The New Code seeks to address these gaps and provide a comprehensive approach to these types of funds.
Disclosure of materially relevant facts
S 34 is another expanded section. It requires the franchisor to provide a franchisee with materially relevant facts that are not included in the Disclosure Document.
This is a section that attracts the higher penalty regime for non-compliance. The reasoning as stated in the Explanatory Statement:
"This is because the information mentioned in section 34 is critical for a prospective franchisee or franchisee to make an informed decision about the franchise agreement and failure on the part of the franchisor to disclose this information can have a significant impact upon a franchisee……This is particularly the case if those updated financial details reveal a significant downturn in the franchisor's position that is not reflected in the disclosure document which was given to the franchisee."
The Explanatory Statement also further seeks to justify the change: "…the higher tier civil penalty reflects the seriousness of this obligation on franchisors and is appropriate to deter misconduct."
End of term arrangements
There are changes to these previous provisions.
Under the New Code, a franchisor must notify the franchisee at least 6 months before the end of term, whether the franchisor will offer a new franchise or extend or not. See S. 36.
Restrictions on Restraint of Trade issues
Restraints of trade against franchisees have also been significantly limited - Ss42 & 67.
Under the new Code, franchisors will be prohibited from entering into any franchise agreements that include a restraint of trade clause that applies if:
"S42 Restraint of trade clause if franchise agreement not renewed or extended
A franchisor must not enter into a franchise agreement that includes (in the agreement, or in another document physically attached to the agreement, or in another document incorporated into the agreement by reference) a restraint of trade clause that would apply if:
Civil penalty: 600 penalty units."
This repeats the former provisions but now includes circumstances where a franchisee has sought to renew a franchise agreement. The drafting of these provisions could be clearer.
Further, this section is now included in the new civil penalties regime.
Compensation for early termination
This arises out of the former Motor Vehicle Dealer code and now applies across all franchises.
A franchisor must not enter into a franchise agreement unless it includes provisions for the for the franchisee to be compensated for early termination of the agreement where the franchisor;
This applies where the franchisor terminates the franchise agreement.
Further, the franchiser agreement must specify how the compensation is to be determined, with specific reference to:
Reasonable opportunity for a return on investment
The New Code has notably expanded a previous provision which required franchisors of motor vehicle dealerships to provide any franchisees with a 'reasonable opportunity' to make a return on investment in the course of their business.
Now, this obligation applies to all franchisors of all franchisees - S 44.
Termination
The new Code 'termination ' provisions are set out in Ss 54, 55, 56, 57 & 58 & 59
They are very prescriptive and need to be strictly adapted and followed by franchisors.
The new civil penalties regime applies to these sections.
Future considerations
A common theme throughout all of these amendments are the increasing risks imposed on franchisors, particularly with respect to drafting the content of the franchise agreements.
The issues discussed in this article, are at a high level and do not cover the full extent of the changes promulgated by the New Code.
For any assistance understanding the new Code, please contact our Franchising team.